Galaxy gas as obscurer: I. GRBs x-ray galaxies and find a N_H ~ M* relation
Johannes Buchner, Steve Schulze, Franz E. Bauer

TL;DR
This study uses X-ray observations of 844 GRB afterglows to investigate the gas content in high-redshift galaxies, revealing a consistent relation between galaxy stellar mass and gas column density, primarily on galaxy scales.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method linking GRB X-ray absorption to galaxy gas properties, establishing a new empirical $N_H$-stellar mass relation and comparing it with simulations.
Findings
The $N_H$ distribution shows no evolution with redshift.
A power-law relation between $N_H$ and stellar mass is established.
Galaxy-scale gas primarily causes GRB obscuration.
Abstract
An important constraint for galaxy evolution models is how much gas resides in galaxies, in particular at the peak of star formation z=1-3. We attempt a novel approach by letting long-duration Gamma Ray Bursts (LGRBs) x-ray their host galaxies and deliver column densities to us. This requires a good understanding of the obscurer and biases introduced by incomplete follow-up observations. We analyse the X-ray afterglow of all 844 Swift LGRBs to date for their column density . To derive the population properties we propagate all uncertainties in a consistent Bayesian methodology. The distribution covers the range and shows no evolutionary effect. Higher obscurations, e.g. Compton-thick columns, could have been detected but are not observed. The distribution is consistent with sources randomly populating a ellipsoidal gas cloud of major axis…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
