Effects of Social Ties in Knowledge Diffusion: case study on PLOS ONE
Felipe Eltermann, Alan Godoy, Fernando J. Von Zuben

TL;DR
This study investigates how social ties, specifically co-authorship proximity, influence knowledge diffusion in scientific publications, revealing that closer collaboration networks significantly enhance knowledge flow more than geographic closeness.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that co-authorship network proximity strongly impacts knowledge diffusion, surpassing geographic factors.
Findings
Closer co-authors have higher likelihood of knowledge flow
Co-authorship proximity is more influential than geographic proximity
Strong social ties facilitate knowledge diffusion in research networks
Abstract
In order to capture the effects of social ties in knowledge diffusion, this paper examines the publication network that emerges from the collaboration of researchers, using citation information as means to estimate knowledge flow. For this purpose, we analyzed the papers published in the PLOS ONE journal finding strong evidence to support that the closer two authors are in the co-authorship network, the larger the probability that knowledge flow will occur between them. Moreover, we also found that when it comes to knowledge diffusion, strong co-authorship proximity is more determinant than geographic proximity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference · Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
