
TL;DR
This paper explores the properties of a topological analogue of transcendence degree in non-archimedean analytic fields, revealing complex behaviors, counterexamples, and applications to Berkovich spaces and field untilts.
Contribution
It introduces and analyzes the topological transcendence degree, highlighting its non-additivity and providing explicit counterexamples, with applications to Berkovich spaces.
Findings
Topological transcendence degree can behave badly, including non-additivity.
Explicit counterexamples demonstrate the sharpness of positive results.
Applications to Berkovich space points and field untilts are discussed.
Abstract
Throughout the paper, an analytic field means a non-archimedean complete real-valued one, and our main objective is to extend to these fields the basic theory of transcendental extensions. One easily introduces a topological analogue of the transcendence degree, but, surprisingly, it turns out that it may behave very badly. For example, a particular case of a theorem of Matignon-Reversat asserts that if then possesses non-invertible continuous -endomorphisms, and this implies that the topological transcendence degree is not additive in towers. Nevertheless, we prove that in some aspects the topological transcendence degree behaves reasonably, and we show by explicit counter-examples that our positive results are pretty sharp. Applications to types of points in Berkovich spaces and untilts of are discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
