Correcting CIV-Based Virial Black Hole Masses
Liam Coatman, Paul C. Hewett, Manda Banerji, Gordon T. Richards,, Joseph F. Hennawi, J. Xavier Prochaska

TL;DR
This study develops an empirical correction for CIV-based black hole mass estimates in quasars, significantly reducing biases caused by blueshifts and enabling more accurate mass measurements at high redshift.
Contribution
The paper introduces a correction method for CIV virial black hole masses based on blueshift and line width, improving accuracy over previous estimates.
Findings
CIV masses are overestimated by a factor of five at 3000 km/s blueshift.
The correction reduces scatter from 0.40 dex to 0.10 dex at high blueshifts.
The correction depends only on CIV line properties, making it widely applicable.
Abstract
The CIV broad emission line is visible in optical spectra to redshifts exceeding z~5. CIV has long been known to exhibit significant displacements to the blue and these `blueshifts' almost certainly signal the presence of strong outflows. As a consequence, single-epoch virial black hole (BH) mass estimates derived from CIV velocity-widths are known to be systematically biased compared to masses from the hydrogen Balmer lines. Using a large sample of 230 high-luminosity (log = 45.5-48 erg/s), redshift 1.5<z<4.0 quasars with both CIV and Balmer line spectra, we have quantified the bias in CIV BH masses as a function of the CIV blueshift. CIV BH masses are shown to be a factor of five larger than the corresponding Balmer-line masses at CIV blueshifts of 3000 km/s and are over-estimated by almost an order of magnitude at the most extreme blueshifts, >5000 km/s. Using the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
