Dynamical rigidity of non discrete representations in PSL(2,R)
Maxime Wolff

TL;DR
This note discusses a rigidity result for non-discrete, non-elementary representations of groups into PSL(2,R), showing that equal rotation numbers imply conjugacy, thus establishing a strong form of uniqueness for such representations.
Contribution
It proves that non-discrete, non-elementary representations with matching rotation numbers are conjugate, clarifying the rigidity of these representations in PSL(2,R).
Findings
Equal rotation numbers imply conjugacy of representations.
Non-discrete, non-elementary representations are uniquely determined by rotation numbers.
Semi-conjugate actions on the circle are conjugate in PSL(2,R).
Abstract
The aim of this note is to advertise on a result, not stated explicitly, but proved, in arXiv:0802.0512. Namely, if is any group, if , are representations of in , one of them being non elementary and non discrete, and if for all , and have the same rotation number, then and are conjugate in . In particular, if two non discrete, non elementary representations yield semi-conjugate actions on the circle, then they are conjugate in .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Operator Algebra Research
