A comparison of the cosmic-ray energy scales of Tunka-133 and KASCADE-Grande via their radio extensions Tunka-Rex and LOPES
W.D. Apel, J.C. Arteaga-Vel\'azquez, L. B\"ahren, P.A. Bezyazeekov, K., Bekk, M. Bertaina, P.L. Biermann, J. Bl\"umer, H. Bozdog, I.M. Brancus, N.M., Budnev, E. Cantoni, A. Chiavassa, K. Daumiller, V. de Souza, F. Di Pierro, P., Doll, R. Engel, H. Falcke, O. Fedorov, B. Fuchs

TL;DR
This study compares the cosmic-ray energy scales of Tunka-133 and KASCADE-Grande experiments using their radio extensions Tunka-Rex and LOPES, demonstrating consistency within approximately 10% accuracy through calibrated radio measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a method to compare cosmic-ray energy scales of different experiments using radio measurements calibrated with a common reference source.
Findings
The energy scales of Tunka-133 and KASCADE-Grande are consistent within 10%.
Calibrated radio measurements can reliably compare different cosmic-ray experiments.
Radio detection provides an absolute energy scale for cosmic-ray air showers.
Abstract
The radio technique is a promising method for detection of cosmic-ray air showers of energies around PeV and higher with an array of radio antennas. Since the amplitude of the radio signal can be measured absolutely and increases with the shower energy, radio measurements can be used to determine the air-shower energy on an absolute scale. We show that calibrated measurements of radio detectors operated in coincidence with host experiments measuring air showers based on other techniques can be used for comparing the energy scales of these host experiments. Using two approaches, first via direct amplitude measurements, and second via comparison of measurements with air shower simulations, we compare the energy scales of the air-shower experiments Tunka-133 and KASCADE-Grande, using their radio extensions, Tunka-Rex and LOPES, respectively. Due to the consistent amplitude…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
