Investigating prominence turbulence with Hinode SOT Dopplergrams

TL;DR

This study analyzes turbulence in quiescent solar prominences using Hinode SOT Dopplergrams, revealing intermittency, distinct scaling regions, and turbulence characteristics consistent with weak MHD turbulence, but with unexpected scale behavior.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed structure function analysis of prominence turbulence, identifying two distinct scaling regimes and their relation to MHD turbulence theories.

Findings

Evidence of intermittency in prominence velocity fields.

Identification of two scaling regimes with different power-law exponents.

Turbulent heating is inefficient, but mass diffusion is significant.

Abstract

Quiescent prominences host a diverse range of flows, including Rayleigh-Taylor instability driven upflows and impulsive downflows, and so it is no surprise that turbulent motions also exist. As prominences are believed to have a mean horizontal guide field, investigating any turbulence they host could shed light on the nature of MHD turbulence in a wide range of astrophysical systems. In this paper we have investigated the nature of the turbulent prominence motions using structure function analysis on the velocity increments estimated from H$\alpha$ Dopplergrams constructed with observational data from Hinode SOT. The pdf of the velocity increments shows that as we look at increasingly small spatial separations the distribution displays greater departure from a reference Gaussian distribution, hinting at intermittency in the velocity field. Analysis of the even order structure functions for both the horizontal and vertical separations showed the existence of two distinct regions displaying different exponents of the power law with the break in the power law at approximately 2000km. We hypothesise this to be a result of internal turbulence excited in the prominence by the dynamic flows of the system found at this spatial scale. We found that the scaling exponents of the p-th order structure functions for these two regions generally followed the p/2 (smaller scales) and p/4 (larger scales) laws that are the same as those predicted for weak MHD turbulence and Kraichnan-Iroshnikov turbulence respectively. However, the existence of the p/4 scaling at larger scales than the p/2 scaling is inconsistent with the increasing nonlinearity expected in MHD turbulence. Estimating the heating from the turbulent energy dissipation showed that this turbulent heating would be very inefficient, but that the mass diffusion through turbulence driven reconnection was of the order of $10^{10}$cm$^2$/s.