Probabilistic metrology or how some measurement outcomes render ultra-precise estimates
J. Calsamiglia, B. Gendra, R. Munoz-Tapia, and E. Bagan

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that probabilistic measurement strategies with abstention can surpass deterministic precision bounds in noisy quantum phase estimation, establishing new ultimate limits on measurement accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a theoretical framework showing how abstention in measurements can improve precision beyond deterministic bounds under noise conditions.
Findings
Probabilistic strategies can outperform deterministic bounds.
Abstention reduces the impact of noise on measurement precision.
Quantitative bounds depend on tolerated failure probability.
Abstract
We show on theoretical grounds that, even in the presence of noise, probabilistic measurement strategies (which have a certain probability of failure or abstention) can provide, upon a heralded successful outcome, estimates with a precision that exceeds the deterministic bounds for the average precision. This establishes a new ultimate bound on the phase estimation precision of particular measurement outcomes (or sequence of outcomes). For probe systems subject to local dephasing, we quantify such precision limit as a function of the probability of failure that can be tolerated. Our results show that the possibility of abstaining can set back the detrimental effects of noise.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
