Classification of crescent configurations
Rebecca F. Durst, Max Hlavacek, Chi Huynh, Steven J. Miller, Eyvindur, A. Palsson

TL;DR
This paper classifies crescent configurations of 4 and 5 points using graph isomorphism and rigidity, offering new insights and methods that could extend to higher dimensions in the study of these geometric arrangements.
Contribution
It provides a systematic classification of small crescent configurations via graph isomorphism and rigidity, introducing techniques that can be generalized to higher dimensions.
Findings
Classified crescent configurations for 4 and 5 points.
Developed a new approach using graph isomorphism and rigidity.
Proposed methods extend to higher-dimensional configurations.
Abstract
Let points be in crescent configurations in if they lie in general position in and determine distinct distances, such that for every there is a distance that occurs exactly times. Since Erd\H{o}s' conjecture in 1989 on the existence of sufficiently large such that no crescent configurations exist on or more points, he, Pomerance, and Pal\'asti have given constructions for up to but nothing is yet known for . Most recently, Burt et. al. had proven that a crescent configuration on points exists in for . In this paper, we study the classification of these configurations on and points through graph isomorphism and rigidity. Our techniques, which can be generalized to higher dimensions, offer a new viewpoint on the problem through the lens of distance geometry…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStructural Analysis and Optimization · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation · graph theory and CDMA systems
