Exact probabilities for the indeterminacy of complex networks as perceived through press perturbations
David Koslicki, Mark Novak

TL;DR
This paper derives exact formulas to quantify the likelihood of incorrect qualitative predictions in complex networks under uncertainty, enhancing probabilistic understanding of network responses to perturbations.
Contribution
It introduces exact formulas for predicting the probability of incorrect responses in complex networks considering uncertainties, reducing reliance on simulations.
Findings
Exact formulas for expected incorrect predictions
Tools for identifying sensitive network links
Methods to determine error bounds for qualitative predictions
Abstract
We consider the goal of predicting how complex networks respond to chronic (press) perturbations when characterizations of their network topology and interaction strengths are associated with uncertainty. Our primary result is the derivation of exact formulas for the expected number and probability of qualitatively incorrect predictions about a system's responses under uncertainties drawn form arbitrary distributions of error. These formulas obviate the current use of simulations, algorithms, and qualitative modeling techniques. Additional indices provide new tools for identifying which links in a network are most qualitatively and quantitatively sensitive to error, and for determining the volume of errors within which predictions will remain qualitatively determinate (i.e. sign insensitive). Together with recent advances in the empirical characterization of uncertainty in ecological…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
