Policy Design for Controlling Set-Point Temperature of ACs in Shared Spaces of Buildings

TL;DR

This paper proposes a novel energy policy for shared office spaces that balances user preferences and discomfort compensation to optimize AC temperature control, promoting energy efficiency and user satisfaction.

Contribution

It introduces a new policy framework allowing users to express preferences and be compensated for discomfort, improving energy management in shared office spaces.

Findings

The policy effectively balances user preferences and energy consumption.

Users are incentivized to participate responsibly in energy savings.

Case studies demonstrate improved energy efficiency and user satisfaction.

Abstract

Air conditioning systems are responsible for the major percentage of energy consumption in buildings. Shared spaces constitute considerable office space area, in which most office employees perform their meetings and daily tasks, and therefore the ACs in these areas have significant impact on the energy usage of the entire office building. The cost of this energy consumption, however, is not paid by the shared space users, and the AC's temperature set-point is not determined based on the users' preferences. This latter factor is compounded by the fact that different people may have different choices of temperature set-points and sensitivities to change of temperature. Therefore, it is a challenging task to design an office policy to decide on a particular set-point based on such a diverse preference set. As a result, users are not aware of the energy consumption in shared spaces, which may potentially increase the energy wastage and related cost of office buildings. In this context, this paper proposes an energy policy for an office shared space by exploiting an established temperature control mechanism. In particular, we choose meeting rooms in an office building as the test case and design a policy according to which each user of the room can give a preference on the temperature set-point and is paid for felt discomfort if the set-point is not fixed according to the given preference. On the other hand, users who enjoy the thermal comfort compensate the other users of the room. Thus, the policy enables the users to be cognizant and responsible for the payment on the energy consumption of the office space they are sharing, and at the same time ensures that the users are satisfied either via thermal comfort or through incentives. The policy is also shown to be beneficial for building management. Through experiment based case studies, we show the effectiveness of the proposed policy.