Adjusting for Unmeasured Spatial Confounding with Distance Adjusted Propensity Score Matching
Georgia Papadogeorgou, Christine Choirat, Corwin Zigler

TL;DR
This paper introduces DAPSm, a novel method that integrates spatial proximity into propensity score matching to better control for both observed and unmeasured spatial confounding in observational studies.
Contribution
The paper develops and evaluates DAPSm, a new approach that incorporates spatial information into propensity score matching to address unmeasured confounding in spatial data.
Findings
DAPSm effectively adjusts for unmeasured spatial confounding.
DAPSm outperforms traditional methods in spatial confounding scenarios.
Application to ozone pollution data demonstrates practical utility.
Abstract
Propensity score matching is a common tool for adjusting for observed confounding in observational studies, but is known to have limitations in the presence of unmeasured confounding. In many settings, researchers are confronted with spatially-indexed data where the relative locations of the observational units may serve as a useful proxy for unmeasured confounding that varies according to a spatial pattern. We develop a new method, termed Distance Adjusted Propensity Score Matching (DAPSm) that incorporates information on units' spatial proximity into a propensity score matching procedure. We show that DAPSm can adjust for both observed and some forms of unobserved confounding and evaluate its performance relative to several other reasonable alternatives for incorporating spatial information into propensity score adjustment. The method is motivated by and applied to a comparative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
