Cohomological rigidity of manifolds defined by right-angled 3-dimensional polytopes
Victor Buchstaber, Nikolay Erokhovets, Mikiya Masuda, Taras Panov and, Seonjeong Park

TL;DR
This paper proves cohomological rigidity for certain 3- and 6-dimensional manifolds derived from specific 3-polytopes, linking topological, combinatorial, and geometric properties using toric topology techniques.
Contribution
It establishes cohomological rigidity for families of manifolds associated with polytopes in class P, connecting cohomology rings with manifold diffeomorphism types.
Findings
Cohomology ring isomorphism implies diffeomorphism for the manifolds.
Diffeomorphic manifolds have combinatorially equivalent polytopes.
Results connect topology, geometry, and combinatorics of 3-polytopes.
Abstract
A family of closed manifolds is called cohomologically rigid if a cohomology ring isomorphism implies a diffeomorphism for any two manifolds in the family. We establish cohomological rigidity for large families of 3-dimensional and 6-dimensional manifolds defined by 3-dimensional polytopes. We consider the class P of 3-dimensional combinatorial simple polytopes, different from a tetrahedron, whose facets do not form 3- and 4-belts. This class includes mathematical fullerenes, i.e. simple 3-polytopes with only 5-gonal and 6-gonal facets. By a theorem of Pogorelov, any polytope from P admits a right-angled realisation in Lobachevsky 3-space, which is unique up to isometry. Our families of smooth manifolds are associated with polytopes from the class P. The first family consists of 3-dimensional small covers of polytopes from P, or hyperbolic 3-manifolds of Loebell type. The second…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
