Noether Symmetry of Palatini $F(\Re)$ gravity
Nayem Sk

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the form of Noether symmetry in Palatini $F( ext{ extgreek e})$ gravity, showing it admits $F( ext{ extgreek e}) ext{ extasciitilde} ext{ extgreek e}^{3/2}$ with a specific conserved current, correcting previous claims.
Contribution
It demonstrates that in Palatini $F( ext{ extgreek e})$ gravity, the symmetry admits a specific power-law form, refuting earlier claims of arbitrary exponents.
Findings
$F( ext{ extgreek e}) ext{ extasciitilde} ext{ extgreek e}^{3/2}$ is the symmetry form.
The conserved current is explicitly derived as $ ext{ extSigma}_0 a[rac{ ext{ extdot}a}{a} + rac{ ext{ extdot} ext{ extPhi}}{2 ext{ extPhi}}]$.
Previous claims of arbitrary power-law forms are shown to be incorrect.
Abstract
In metric formalism, Noether symmetry of F(R) theory of gravity in vacuum and in the presence of pressureless dust yields along with the conserved current in Robertson-Walker metric and nothing else. However, Roshan et.al. had claimed in \cite{o} that Noether symmetry in the context of Palatini theory of gravity admits , (where is an arbitrary constant) in matter domain era in Friedmann- Robertson-Walker universe. But, it has been shown that the conserved current obtained under the process does not satisfy the field equations in general. Here, it is shown that Noether Symmetry admits along with a conserved current in Palatini gravity. Thus, their claim is not…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Scientific Research and Discoveries
