Evolutionary State-Space Model and Its Application to Time-Frequency Analysis of Local Field Potentials

TL;DR

This paper introduces an evolutionary state space model (E-SSM) for analyzing high-dimensional brain signals that evolve over time, capturing non-stationary oscillatory components and their power dynamics during experiments.

Contribution

The paper presents a novel E-SSM framework with a computational algorithm for non-stationary brain signal analysis, outperforming classical methods like ICA and filtering.

Findings

E-SSM effectively captures power evolution of brain components.

Identifies electrode clusters with similar source behavior.

Reveals activity changes across experimental phases.

Abstract

We propose an evolutionary state space model (E-SSM) for analyzing high dimensional brain signals whose statistical properties evolve over the course of a non-spatial memory experiment. Under E-SSM, brain signals are modeled as mixtures of components (e.g., AR(2) process) with oscillatory activity at pre-defined frequency bands. To account for the potential non-stationarity of these components (since the brain responses could vary throughout the entire experiment), the parameters are allowed to vary over epochs. Compared with classical approaches such as independent component analysis and filtering, the proposed method accounts for the entire temporal correlation of the components and accommodates non-stationarity. For inference purpose, we propose a novel computational algorithm based upon using Kalman smoother, maximum likelihood and blocked resampling. The E-SSM model is applied to simulation studies and an application to a multi-epoch local field potentials (LFP) signal data collected from a non-spatial (olfactory) sequence memory task study. The results confirm that our method captures the evolution of the power for different components across different phases in the experiment and identifies clusters of electrodes that behave similarly with respect to the decomposition of different sources. These findings suggest that the activity of different electrodes does change over the course of an experiment in practice, treating these epoch recordings as realizations of an identical process could lead to misleading results. In summary, the proposed method underscores the importance of capturing the evolution in brain responses over the study period.