Sensitivity analysis for an unobserved moderator in RCT-to-target-population generalization of treatment effects
Trang Quynh Nguyen, Cyrus Ebnesajjad, Stephen R. Cole, Elizabeth A., Stuart

TL;DR
This paper develops sensitivity analysis methods to assess how unobserved moderators affect the generalization of treatment effects from RCTs to target populations, especially when some moderators are unobserved or unmeasured.
Contribution
It introduces new sensitivity analysis techniques for unobserved moderators in RCT-to-population generalization, addressing both observed and unobserved moderators with multiple methods.
Findings
Three methods for unobserved moderators with observed outcome
Two methods for unobserved moderators without outcome data
Application to smoking cessation RCT with unobserved moderator analysis
Abstract
In the presence of treatment effect heterogeneity, the average treatment effect (ATE) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) may differ from the average effect of the same treatment if applied to a target population of interest. If all treatment effect moderators are observed in the RCT and in a dataset representing the target population, we can obtain an estimate for the target population ATE by adjusting for the difference in the distribution of the moderators between the two samples. This paper considers sensitivity analyses for two situations: (1) where we cannot adjust for a specific moderator observed in the RCT because we do not observe it in the target population; and (2) where we are concerned that the treatment effect may be moderated by factors not observed even in the RCT, which we represent as a composite moderator . In both situations, the outcome is not observed in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
