Three observational differences for binary black holes detections with second and third generation gravitational-wave detectors
Salvatore Vitale

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that assumptions about binary black hole detections with current gravitational-wave detectors do not hold universally, and shows how third-generation detectors will revise these assumptions, impacting source characterization.
Contribution
It reveals the limitations of current detection assumptions and analyzes how third-generation detectors will change our understanding of binary black hole observations.
Findings
Current detectors favor higher mass systems
Most events are oriented with their angular momentum towards or away from Earth
Quiet events are more numerous than loud ones
Abstract
Advanced gravitational-wave observatories, such as LIGO and Virgo, will detect hundreds of gravitational waves emitted by binary black holes in the next few years. The collection of detected sources is expected to have certain properties. It is expected that a selection bias will exist toward higher mass systems, that most events will be oriented with their angular momentum pointing to or away from Earth, and that quiet events will be much more numerous than loud events. In this paper we show how all these assumptions are only true for existing detectors and do not have any universality. Using an network of proposed third-generation gravitational wave detectors, we show how each of these assumptions must be revised and we discuss several consequences on the characterization of the sources.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Geophysics and Sensor Technology
