A novel comparison of M{\o}ller and Compton electron-beam polarimeters
J. A. Magee, A. Narayan, D. Jones, R. Beminiwattha, J. C. Cornejo, M., M. Dalton, W. Deconinck, D. Dutta, D. Gaskell, J. W. Martin, K. D. Paschke,, V. Tvaskis, A. Asaturyan, J. Benesch, G. Cates, B. S. Cavness, L. A., Dillon-Townes, G. Hays, J. Hoskins, E. Ihloff, R. Jones

TL;DR
This study compares M{46}ller and Compton electron-beam polarimeters at Jefferson Lab, confirming their measurements agree within 1% across different beam currents, supporting their use in high-precision experiments.
Contribution
It provides the first direct comparison of M{46}ller and Compton polarimeters at low and high beam currents, validating their consistency for precision polarization measurements.
Findings
Measurements agree within 1% across beam currents
Electron polarization is independent of beam current
Sets benchmark for future high-precision polarimetry
Abstract
We have performed a novel comparison between electron-beam polarimeters based on M{\o}ller and Compton scattering. A sequence of electron-beam polarization measurements were performed at low beam currents ( 5 A) during the experiment in Hall C at Jefferson Lab. These low current measurements were bracketed by the regular high current (180 A) operation of the Compton polarimeter. All measurements were found to be consistent within experimental uncertainties of 1% or less, demonstrating that electron polarization does not depend significantly on the beam current. This result lends confidence to the common practice of applying M{\o}ller measurements made at low beam currents to physics experiments performed at higher beam currents. The agreement between two polarimetry techniques based on independent physical processes sets an important benchmark for future…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
