The cost of swimming in generalized Newtonian fluids: Experiments with C. elegans
David A. Gagnon, Paulo E. Arratia

TL;DR
This study experimentally investigates how the cost of swimming for C. elegans varies in shear-thinning fluids versus Newtonian fluids, confirming that shear-thinning reduces the energy expenditure of undulatory swimming.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental validation that shear-thinning rheology decreases the swimming cost of C. elegans, aligning with theoretical predictions and offering a predictive framework.
Findings
Cost of swimming is lower or equal in shear-thinning fluids compared to Newtonian fluids.
Swimming cost scales with the fluid's effective viscosity and can be predicted from rheology and kinematics.
Results align with theoretical models, enhancing understanding of microorganism locomotion in complex fluids.
Abstract
Numerous natural processes are contingent on microorganisms' ability to swim through fluids with non-Newtonian rheology. Here, we use the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans and tracking methods to experimentally investigate the dynamics of undulatory swimming in shear-thinning fluids. Theory and simulation have proposed that the cost of swimming, or mechanical power, should be lower in a shear-thinning fluid compared to a Newtonian fluid of the same zero-shear viscosity. We aim to provide an experimental investigation into the cost of swimming in a shear-thinning fluid from (i) an estimate of the mechanical power of the swimmer and (ii) the viscous dissipation rate of the flow field, which should yield equivalent results for a self-propelled low Reynolds number swimmer. We find the cost of swimming in shear-thinning fluids is less than or equal to the cost of swimming in Newtonian…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
