Area-preserving diffeomorphism of the hyperbolic plane and K-surfaces in Anti-de Sitter space
Francesco Bonsante, Andrea Seppi

TL;DR
This paper establishes a correspondence between certain spacelike surfaces in Anti-de Sitter space and area-preserving diffeomorphisms of the hyperbolic plane, leading to new results on the boundary behavior and extensions of quasisymmetric homeomorphisms.
Contribution
It introduces a representation formula linking spacelike surfaces in Anti-de Sitter space with area-preserving diffeomorphisms, and proves existence and uniqueness of K-surfaces with prescribed boundary curves.
Findings
Every weakly acausal boundary curve bounds two K-surfaces with specified convexity.
Quasisymmetric boundary curves correspond to K-surfaces with bounded principal curvatures.
Every quasisymmetric homeomorphism admits a unique quasiconformal extension as a hyperbolic landslide.
Abstract
We prove that any weakly acausal curve in the boundary of Anti-de Sitter (2+1)-space is the asymptotic boundary of two spacelike -surfaces, one of which is past-convex and the other future-convex, for every . The curve is the graph of a quasisymmetric homeomorphism of the circle if and only if the -surfaces have bounded principal curvatures. Moreover in this case a uniqueness result holds. The proofs rely on a well-known correspondence between spacelike surfaces in Anti-de Sitter space and area-preserving diffeomorphisms of the hyperbolic plane. In fact, an important ingredient is a representation formula, which reconstructs a spacelike surface from the associated area-preserving diffeomorphism. Using this correspondence we then deduce that, for any fixed , every quasisymmetric homeomorphism of the circle admits a unique…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
