Measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation based on 1230 days of operation of the Daya Bay experiment
Daya Bay Collaboration: F. P. An, A. B. Balantekin, H. R. Band, M., Bishai, S. Blyth, D. Cao, G. F. Cao, J. Cao, W. R. Cen, Y. L. Chan, J. F., Chang, L. C. Chang, Y. Chang, H. S. Chen, Q. Y. Chen, S. M. Chen, Y. X. Chen,, Y. Chen, J.-H. Cheng, J. Cheng, Y. P. Cheng, Z. K. Cheng

TL;DR
The Daya Bay experiment measured electron antineutrino oscillations over 1230 days, providing precise values for neutrino mixing parameters and confirming the oscillation phenomenon through observed energy-dependent disappearance.
Contribution
This work presents the most precise measurement of the neutrino mixing angle θ13 and the mass-squared difference Δm² using a large dataset from the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment.
Findings
Measured θ13 as 0.0841 ± 0.0027 (stat.) ± 0.0019 (syst.)
Determined |Δm²_ee| as (2.50 ± 0.06 (stat.) ± 0.06 (syst.))×10⁻³ eV²
Confirmed energy-dependent neutrino disappearance consistent with oscillation models
Abstract
A measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation by the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment is described in detail. Six 2.9-GW nuclear power reactors of the Daya Bay and Ling Ao nuclear power facilities served as intense sources of 's. Comparison of the rate and energy spectrum measured by antineutrino detectors far from the nuclear reactors (1500-1950 m) relative to detectors near the reactors (350-600 m) allowed a precise measurement of disappearance. More than 2.5 million inverse beta decay interactions were observed, based on the combination of 217 days of operation of six antineutrino detectors (Dec. 2011--Jul. 2012) with a subsequent 1013 days using the complete configuration of eight detectors (Oct. 2012--Jul. 2015). The rate observed at the far…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
