Tight Approximation Bounds for the Seminar Assignment Problem
Amotz Bar-Noy, George Rabanca

TL;DR
This paper introduces a greedy algorithm for the seminar assignment problem, providing a tight approximation bound of (1 - e^{-1}) and establishing its optimality under standard complexity assumptions.
Contribution
The paper proves that a natural greedy algorithm achieves a (1 - e^{-1}) approximation ratio for the seminar assignment problem, matching the best possible bound unless unlikely complexity class collapses.
Findings
Greedy algorithm achieves (1 - e^{-1}) approximation ratio.
This bound is proven to be tight under standard complexity assumptions.
The problem is NP-complete and lacks a PTAS.
Abstract
The seminar assignment problem is a variant of the generalized assignment problem in which items have unit size and the amount of space allowed in each bin is restricted to an arbitrary set of values. The problem has been shown to be NP-complete and to not admit a PTAS. However, the only constant factor approximation algorithm known to date is randomized and it is not guaranteed to always produce a feasible solution. In this paper we show that a natural greedy algorithm outputs a solution with value within a factor of of the optimal, and that unless , this is the best approximation guarantee achievable by any polynomial time algorithm.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Optimization and Search Problems · Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
