Black hole feeding and feedback: the physics inside the "subgrid"
Andrea Negri, Marta Volonteri

TL;DR
This study evaluates how well the approximate Bondi-Hoyle accretion model captures black hole growth and feedback in galaxy simulations across different resolutions, highlighting its limitations and variability.
Contribution
It compares hydrodynamical simulations at various resolutions using Bondi-Hoyle approximation with high-resolution non-parameterized runs to assess accuracy.
Findings
Bondi-Hoyle can overestimate or underestimate BH growth
Resolution affects the accuracy of accretion estimates
Approximate models have limitations depending on variable calculation methods
Abstract
Black holes (BHs) are believed to be a key ingredient of galaxy formation. However, the galaxy-BH interplay is challenging to study due to the large dynamical range and complex physics involved. As a consequence, hydrodynamical cosmological simulations normally adopt sub-grid models to track the unresolved physical processes, in particular BH accretion; usually the spatial scale where the BH dominates the hydrodynamical processes (the Bondi radius) is unresolved, and an approximate Bondi-Hoyle accretion rate is used to estimate the growth of the BH. By comparing hydrodynamical simulations at different resolutions (300, 30, 3 pc) using a Bondi-Hoyle approximation to sub-parsec runs with non-parameterized accretion, our aim is to probe how well an approximated Bondi accretion is able to capture the BH accretion physics and the subsequent feedback on the galaxy. We analyse an isolated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
