KiDS-450: Testing extensions to the standard cosmological model
Shahab Joudaki, Alexander Mead, Chris Blake, Ami Choi, Jelte de Jong,, Thomas Erben, Ian Fenech Conti, Ricardo Herbonnet, Catherine Heymans, Hendrik, Hildebrandt, Henk Hoekstra, Benjamin Joachimi, Dominik Klaes, Fabian, K\"ohlinger, Konrad Kuijken, John McFarland, Lance Miller

TL;DR
This study tests various extensions to the standard cosmological model using weak lensing data from KiDS-450, finding evolving dark energy models can reconcile discrepancies with Planck data and providing new constraints on neutrino masses and other parameters.
Contribution
It introduces an analysis of extended cosmologies with KiDS-450 data, highlighting evolving dark energy as a potential solution to dataset discordance and providing updated parameter constraints.
Findings
Evolving dark energy models reduce tension between KiDS and Planck datasets.
KiDS constrains the sum of neutrino masses to 4.0 eV (95% CL).
No evidence found for modifications to gravity or spectral index running.
Abstract
We test extensions to the standard cosmological model with weak gravitational lensing tomography using 450 deg of imaging data from the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS). In these extended cosmologies, which include massive neutrinos, nonzero curvature, evolving dark energy, modified gravity, and running of the scalar spectral index, we also examine the discordance between KiDS and cosmic microwave background measurements from Planck. The discordance between the two datasets is largely unaffected by a more conservative treatment of the lensing systematics and the removal of angular scales most sensitive to nonlinear physics. The only extended cosmology that simultaneously alleviates the discordance with Planck and is at least moderately favored by the data includes evolving dark energy with a time-dependent equation of state (in the form of the parameterization). In this model,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
