What can we learn from NJL-type models about dense matter?
Michael Buballa

TL;DR
This paper critically discusses the strengths and limitations of NJL-type models in understanding dense matter, emphasizing their usefulness for gaining qualitative insights into the QCD phase diagram despite quantitative uncertainties.
Contribution
It highlights the potential of NJL models as a theoretical tool for exploring dense matter and the QCD phase diagram, clarifying their qualitative insights and limitations.
Findings
NJL models provide valuable qualitative insights into the QCD phase diagram.
Quantitative predictions from NJL models should be treated with caution.
The paper demonstrates examples where NJL models inform dense matter physics.
Abstract
The merits and limitations of the Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model as a model for strong interactions at nonzero density are critically discussed. We present several examples, demonstrating that, while in general the results should not be trusted quantitatively, the NJL model is a powerful theoretical tool for getting new insights and ideas about the QCD phase diagram and the dense-matter equation of state.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
