Halo ellipticity of GAMA galaxy groups from KiDS weak lensing
Edo van Uitert, Henk Hoekstra, Benjamin Joachimi, Peter Schneider,, Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Ami Choi, Thomas Erben, Catherine Heymans, Hendrik, Hildebrandt, Andrew M. Hopkins, Dominik Klaes, Konrad Kuijken, Reiko, Nakajima, Nicola R. Napolitano, Tim Schrabback, Edwin Valentijn

TL;DR
This study measures the average ellipticity of galaxy group halos using weak lensing data from GAMA and KiDS, finding consistency with simulations and highlighting the importance of the BCG as an orientation proxy.
Contribution
It introduces a new method to relate shear quadrupole moments to elliptical NFW profiles and identifies the BCG as the best proxy for halo orientation on small scales.
Findings
Average halo ellipticity e_h=0.38 +/- 0.12 on <250 kpc scales
BCG is the best proxy for dark matter halo orientation on small scales
Satellite distribution better traces halo shape on larger scales
Abstract
We constrain the average halo ellipticity of ~2 600 galaxy groups from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey, using the weak gravitational lensing signal measured from the overlapping Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS). To do so, we quantify the azimuthal dependence of the stacked lensing signal around seven different proxies for the orientation of the dark matter distribution, as it is a priori unknown which one traces the orientation best. On small scales, the major axis of the brightest group/cluster member (BCG) provides the best proxy, leading to a clear detection of an anisotropic signal. In order to relate that to a halo ellipticity, we have to adopt a model density profile. We derive new expressions for the quadrupole moments of the shear field given an elliptical model surface mass density profile. Modeling the signal with an elliptical Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile on scales <…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
