Mackey analogy via $\mathcal{D}$-modules in the example of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$
Qijun Tan, Yijun Yao, Shilin Yu

TL;DR
This paper explores the Mackey analogy for $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ using $\mathcal{D}$-modules, proposing a geometric conjecture to deepen understanding of the relationship between representations of real reductive groups and their Cartan motion groups.
Contribution
It introduces a geometric approach via $\mathcal{D}$-modules to understand the Mackey-Higson conjecture for $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$, proposing a new conjecture for the general case.
Findings
Study of admissible $\mathcal{D}$-modules over flag varieties of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$
Formulation of a conjecture linking geometric $\mathcal{D}$-module structures to the Mackey-Higson correspondence
Provides a framework for understanding the conjecture in the general case
Abstract
A conjecture by Mackey and Higson claims that there is close relationship between irreducible representations of a real reductive group and those of its Cartan motion group. The case of irreducible tempered unitary representations has been verified recently by Afgoustidis. We study the admissible representations of by considering families of -modules over its flag varieties. We make a conjecture which gives a geometric understanding of the Makcey-Higson bijection in the general case.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra
