1-well-covered graphs revisited
Vadim E. Levit, Eugen Mandrescu

TL;DR
This paper explores properties and characterizations of 1-well-covered graphs, a subclass of well-covered graphs, and investigates how certain graph operations affect their structure and well-coveredness.
Contribution
It provides new characterizations of 1-well-covered graphs and examines how graph operations like corona, join, and concatenation influence their properties.
Findings
Deleting a shedding vertex preserves well-coveredness.
G belongs to W_{2} if and only if it is 1-well-covered without isolated vertices.
New characterizations of 1-well-covered graphs are introduced.
Abstract
A graph is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same size (M. D. Plummer, 1970). A well-covered graph is 1-well-covered if the deletion of every vertex leaves a graph which is well-covered as well (J. W. Staples, 1975). A graph G belongs to class W_{n} if every n pairwise disjoint independent sets in G are included in pairwise disjoint maximum independent sets (J. W. Staples, 1975). Clearly, W_{1} is the family of all well-covered graphs. It turns out that G belongs to W_{2} if and only if it is a 1-well-covered graph without isolated vertices. We show that deleting a shedding vertex does not change the maximum size of a maximal independent set including a given independent set A in a graph G. Specifically, for well-covered graphs, it means that the vertex v is shedding if and only if G-v is well-covered. In addition, we provide new characterizations of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · semigroups and automata theory
