High-redshift major mergers weakly enhance star formation
J. Fensch, F. Renaud, F. Bournaud, P.-A. Duc, O. Agertz, P. Amram, F., Combes, P. Di Matteo, B. Elmegreen, E. Emsellem, C. J. Jog, V. Perret, C., Struck, R. Teyssier

TL;DR
High-redshift galaxy mergers are less effective at triggering starbursts than low-redshift ones, with only mild increases in star formation due to different physical mechanisms, despite high initial star formation rates.
Contribution
This study uses high-resolution simulations to compare star formation in galaxy mergers across redshifts, revealing reduced efficiency at high redshift.
Findings
High-redshift mergers produce ~10 times less star formation excess than low-redshift mergers.
Mechanisms like turbulence and gas inflows are only mildly enhanced at high redshift.
High initial star formation rates do not prevent merger-induced star formation increases.
Abstract
Galaxy mergers are believed to trigger strong starbursts. This is well assessed by observations in the local Universe. However the efficiency of this mechanism has poorly been tested so far for high redshift, actively star forming, galaxies. We present a suite of pc-resolution hydrodynamical numerical simulations to compare the star formation process along a merging sequence of high and low z galaxies, by varying the gas mass fraction between the two models. We show that, for the same orbit, high-redshift gas-rich mergers are less efficient than low-redshift ones at producing starbursts: the star formation rate excess induced by the merger and its duration are both around 10 times lower than in the low gas fraction case. The mechanisms that account for the star formation triggering at low redshift - the increased compressive turbulence, gas fragmentation, and central gas inflows - are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
