Single-particle excitation of core states in epitaxial silicene
Chi-Cheng Lee, Jun Yoshinobu, Kozo Mukai, Shinya Yoshimoto, Hiroaki, Ueda, Rainer Friedlein, Antoine Fleurence, Yukiko Yamada-Takamura, and, Taisuke Ozaki

TL;DR
This study reexamines silicene's core-level XPS spectra and employs advanced $ ext{Δ}$SCF calculations to accurately determine single-particle excitation energies, resolving previous discrepancies and confirming DFT's effectiveness in surface electron interactions.
Contribution
It introduces a refined analysis of XPS spectra and applies a sophisticated $ ext{Δ}$SCF approach to accurately compute core-level excitation energies in silicene.
Findings
Theoretical core-level binding energies agree well with experimental XPS data.
Reanalysis of XPS spectra clarifies the sequence of Si 2p orbitals.
The study confirms DFT's capability to describe many-body electron interactions at surfaces.
Abstract
Recent studies of core-level X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of silicene on ZrB(0001) were found to be inconsistent with the density of states (DOS) of a planar-like structure that has been proposed as the ground state by density functional theory (DFT). To resolve the discrepancy, a reexamination of the XPS spectra and direct theoretical access of accurate single-particle excitation energies are desired. By analyzing the XPS data using symmetric Voigt functions, different binding energies and its sequence of Si orbitals can be assigned from previously reported ones where asymmetric pseudo-Voigt functions are adopted. Theoretically, we have adopted an approach developed very recently, which follows the sophisticated self-consistent field (SCF) methods, to study the single-particle excitation of core states. In the calculations, each…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
