Approaching a realistic force balance in geodynamo simulations
Rakesh K. Yadav, Thomas Gastine, Ulrich R. Christensen, Scott J. Wolk,, Katja Poppenhaeger

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that geodynamo simulations can realistically achieve a MAC force balance with low viscosity, showing that magnetic forces dominate over viscous and inertial forces, aligning better with Earth's core physics.
Contribution
It provides direct analysis showing that reducing viscosity in simulations leads to a MAC balance, improving the physical realism of geodynamo models.
Findings
Lorentz, buoyancy, and Coriolis forces are of similar magnitude in the simulation.
Viscous and inertial forces are at least 20 times smaller than magnetic and buoyancy forces.
Dynamo flow is larger scale, less geostrophic, and transports twice as much heat compared to non-magnetic convection.
Abstract
Earth sustains its magnetic field by a dynamo process driven by convection in the liquid outer core. Geodynamo simulations have been successful in reproducing many observed properties of the geomagnetic field. However, while theoretical considerations suggest that flow in the core is governed by a balance between Lorentz force, rotational force and buoyancy (called MAC balance for Magnetic, Archimedean, Coriolis) with only minute roles for viscous and inertial forces, dynamo simulations must employ viscosity values that are many orders of magnitude larger than in the core due to computational constraints. In typical geodynamo models viscous and inertial forces are not much smaller than the Coriolis force and the Lorentz force plays a sub-dominant role. This has led to conclusions that these simulations are viscously controlled and do not represent the physics of the geodynamo. Here we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
