Systematic comparison of photoionised plasma codes with application to spectroscopic studies of AGN in X-rays
M. Mehdipour, J.S. Kaastra, T. Kallman

TL;DR
This study systematically compares leading photoionisation codes to assess their impact on X-ray spectroscopic analysis of AGN outflows, revealing significant deviations that influence astrophysical interpretations and emphasizing the need for ongoing code development.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of Cloudy, SPEX, and XSTAR codes, quantifying their differences and effects on spectroscopic modeling of AGN in X-rays.
Findings
Approximately 30% deviation in ionic abundance peak ionisation parameter between codes.
About 30% deviation in optical depth of absorption lines at log ξ ~ 1-2.
Model parameter deviations of 10-40% due to code differences.
Abstract
Atomic data and plasma models play a crucial role in the diagnosis and interpretation of astrophysical spectra, thus influencing our understanding of the universe. In this investigation we present a systematic comparison of the leading photoionisation codes to determine how much their intrinsic differences impact X-ray spectroscopic studies of hot plasmas in photoionisation equilibrium. We carry out our computations using the Cloudy, SPEX, and XSTAR photoionisation codes, and compare their derived thermal and ionisation states for various ionising spectral energy distributions. We examine the resulting absorption-line spectra from these codes for the case of ionised outflows in active galactic nuclei. By comparing the ionic abundances as a function of ionisation parameter , we find that on average there is about 30% deviation between the codes in where ionic abundances peak.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
