Galaxy Zoo: Quantitative Visual Morphological Classifications for 48,000 galaxies from CANDELS
B. D. Simmons, Chris Lintott, Kyle W. Willett, Karen L. Masters,, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Boris H\"au{\ss}ler, Sugata Kaviraj, Coleman Krawczyk,, S. J. Kruk, Daniel H. McIntosh, R. J. Smethurst, Robert C. Nichol, Claudia, Scarlata, Kevin Schawinski, Christopher J. Conselice

TL;DR
This paper presents detailed visual morphological classifications for 48,000 galaxies from the CANDELS survey, using Galaxy Zoo data to analyze galaxy features and compare with previous classifications, providing depth-corrected and consensus-based results.
Contribution
It introduces a large-scale, consensus-based visual classification method for galaxies, incorporating depth corrections and comparisons with prior classifications, enhancing morphological analysis at high redshift.
Findings
High agreement with previous classifications
Depth-corrected classifications enable consistent analysis across surveys
Identification of a sample of featureless disks at 1 < z < 3
Abstract
We present quantified visual morphologies of approximately 48,000 galaxies observed in three Hubble Space Telescope legacy fields by the Cosmic And Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS) and classified by participants in the Galaxy Zoo project. 90% of galaxies have z < 3 and are observed in rest-frame optical wavelengths by CANDELS. Each galaxy received an average of 40 independent classifications, which we combine into detailed morphological information on galaxy features such as clumpiness, bar instabilities, spiral structure, and merger and tidal signatures. We apply a consensus-based classifier weighting method that preserves classifier independence while effectively down-weighting significantly outlying classifications. After analysing the effect of varying image depth on reported classifications, we also provide depth-corrected classifications which both preserve…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
