X-ray selected BALQSOs
M.J. Page, F.J. Carrera, M. Ceballos, A. Corral, J. Ebrero, P. Esquej,, M. Krumpe, S. Mateos, S. Rosen, A. Schwope, A. Streblyanska, M. Symeonidis,, J.A. Tedds, M.G. Watson

TL;DR
This study analyzes six X-ray selected BALQSOs, revealing that they are intrinsically X-ray bright with absorption similar to optically-selected BALQSOs, challenging the notion that BALQSOs are X-ray weak.
Contribution
First X-ray selected BALQSO sample analyzed, showing they are X-ray bright with absorption properties similar to optically-selected BALQSOs.
Findings
All six BALQSOs show X-ray absorption.
X-ray selected BALQSOs have typical alpha_OX values.
X-ray weakness is not inherent to BALQSOs.
Abstract
We study a sample of six X-ray selected broad absorption line (BAL) quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) from the XMM-Newton Wide Angle Survey. All six objects are classified as BALQSOs using the classic balnicity index, and together they form the largest sample of X-ray selected BALQSOs. We find evidence for absorption in the X-ray spectra of all six objects. An ionized absorption model applied to an X-ray spectral shape that would be typical for non-BAL QSOs (a power law with energy index alpha=0.98) provides acceptable fits to the X-ray spectra of all six objects. The optical to X-ray spectral indices, alpha_OX, of the X-ray selected BALQSOs, have a mean value of 1.69 +- 0.05, which is similar to that found for X-ray selected and optically selected non-BAL QSOs of similar ultraviolet luminosity. In contrast, optically-selected BALQSOs typically have much larger alpha_OX and so are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
