
TL;DR
This paper surveys the relationship between forcing axioms and non-constructive principles like the axiom of choice, exploring their reformulations, model-theoretic perspectives, and potential for providing complete set-theoretic semantics.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive overview of how forcing axioms relate to various principles and discusses their potential to serve as a complete semantics for certain set-theoretic models.
Findings
Forcing axioms can reformulate the axiom of choice and Baire's theorem.
Deep analogies exist between ultraproducts and Shoenfield's absoluteness.
Forcing axioms may provide a complete semantics for initial set-theoretic fragments.
Abstract
We give a brief survey on the interplay between forcing axioms and various other non-constructive principles widely used in many fields of abstract mathematics, such as the axiom of choice and Baire's category theorem. First of all we outline how, using basic partial order theory, it is possible to reformulate the axiom of choice, Baire's category theorem, and many large cardinal axioms as specific instances of forcing axioms. We then address forcing axioms with a model-theoretic perspective and outline a deep analogy existing between the standard {\L}o\'s Theorem for ultraproducts of first order structures and Shoenfield's absoluteness for -properties. Finally we address the question of whether and to what extent forcing axioms can provide a "complete" semantics for set theory. We argue that to a large extent this is possible for certain initial fragments of the universe…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
