On spacetime structure and electrodynamics

TL;DR

This paper reviews the connection between spacetime structure, electrodynamics, and the Weak Equivalence Principle, emphasizing how empirical tests constrain the existence of axion and dilaton fields in the vacuum.

Contribution

It demonstrates that the nonbirefringence of light in spacetime implies a metric form with only axion and dilaton degrees of freedom, and reviews empirical tests of these fields.

Findings

Nonbirefringence constrains spacetime to metric form with axion and dilaton.

Empirical tests limit the presence of axion and dilaton fields in vacuum.

Stronger WEP II implies a pure metric theory without axion or dilaton.

Abstract

Since almost all phenomena electrodynamics deal with have energy scales much lower than the Higgs mass energy and intermediate boson energy, electrodynamics of continuous media should be applicable and the constitutive relation of spacetime/vacuum should be local and linear. What is the key characteristic of the spacetime/vacuum? It is the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP I) for photons/wave packets of light which states that the spacetime trajectory of light in a gravitational field depends only on its initial position and direction of propagation, and does not depend on its frequency (energy) and polarization, i.e. nonbirefringence of light propagation in spacetime/vacuum. With this principle it is proved by the author in 1981 in the weak field limit, and by Lammerzahl and Hehl in 2004 together with Favaro and Bergamin in 2011 without assuming the weak-field condition that the constitutive tensor must be of the core metric form with only two additional degrees of freedom - the pseudoscalar (Abelian axion or EM axion) degree of freedom and the scalar (dilaton) degree of freedom (i.e. metric with axion and dilaton). In this paper, we review this connection and the ultrahigh precision empirical tests of nonbirefringence together with present status of tests of cosmic Abelian axion and dilaton. If the stronger version of WEP is assumed, i.e. WEP II for photons (wave packets of light) which states in addition to WEP I also that the polarization state of the light would not change (e.g. no polarization rotation for linear polarized light) and no amplification/attenuation of light, then no Abelian (EM) axion and no dilaton, and we have a pure metric theory.