ZFC proves that the class of ordinals is not weakly compact for definable classes
Ali Enayat, Joel David Hamkins

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that within ZFC, the class of all ordinals lacks certain large cardinal properties when considering definable classes, showing failures of definable tree, partition, and compactness properties, and exploring related principles.
Contribution
It establishes the non-weak compactness of the class of all ordinals for definable classes in ZFC, including failures of key definable properties and analysis of the definable diamond principle.
Findings
Definable tree property fails for Ord in ZFC.
Definable partition property fails for Ord in ZFC.
Definable compactness property fails for $\,\mathcal{L}_{\infty,\omega}$.
Abstract
We prove that the class of all ordinals Ord is not weakly compact with respect to definable classes. Specifically, in any model of ZFC, the definable tree property fails for Ord, in that there is a definable Ord tree with no definable cofinal branch; the definable partition property fails, in that there is a definable 2-coloring of pairs from a certain definable proper class, with no definable homogeneous proper class; and the definable compactness property fails for , in that there is a definable theory in this logic all of whose set-sized subtheories are satisfiable, but which has no definable proper class model. In addition, we prove that the definable diamond principle holds if and only if there is a definable well-ordering of the universe. And we prove that the common theory of all spartan models of G\"odel-Bernays set theory, those…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
