Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? IV. The Galactic Center
Richard de Grijs (KIAA, Peking University, China), Giuseppe Bono, (Universit\`a di Roma Tor Vergata, Italy)

TL;DR
This study compiles and analyzes a comprehensive database of Galactic Center distance measurements to derive a well-supported estimate of 8.3 kpc, addressing publication bias and implications for Galactic parameters.
Contribution
It provides the most complete and statistically justified Galactic Center distance estimate by analyzing diverse measurement methods and assessing publication bias.
Findings
Final Galactic Center distance: 8.3 ± 0.2 (stat) ± 0.4 (sys) kpc.
Publication bias appears negligible in centroid-based measurements.
Revisions needed for IAU recommended values of R0 and Θ0.
Abstract
Aiming at deriving a statistically well-justified Galactic Center distance, , and reducing any occurrence of publication bias, we compiled the most comprehensive and most complete database of Galactic Center distances available to date, containing 273 new or revised estimates published since records began in October 1918 until June 2016. We separate our compilation into direct and indirect distance measurements. The latter include a large body of estimates that rely on centroid determinations for a range of tracer populations as well as measurements based on kinematic observations of objects at the solar circle, combined with a mass and/or rotational model of the Milky Way. Careful assessment of the Galactic Center distances resulting from orbital modeling and statistical parallax measurements in the Galactic nucleus yields our final Galactic Center distance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
