The Search for Failed Supernovae with the Large Binocular Telescope: Constraints from 7 Years of Data
S. M. Adams, C. S. Kochanek, J. R. Gerke, and K. Z. Stanek

TL;DR
This study uses 7 years of data from the Large Binocular Telescope to search for failed supernovae in nearby galaxies, finding a potential failure rate that explains missing high-mass progenitors and black hole mass distribution.
Contribution
First long-term observational constraints on failed supernovae fraction using LBT data, providing upper limits and implications for stellar evolution models.
Findings
Estimated failed supernova fraction is approximately 14% with large uncertainties.
No new failed supernova candidates identified in 7 years of data.
Failed supernovae could account for missing high-mass red supergiant progenitors.
Abstract
We report updated results for the first 7 years of our program to monitor 27 galaxies within 10 Mpc using the Large Binocular Telescope to search for failed supernovae (SNe) -- core-collapses of massive stars that form black holes without luminous supernovae. In the new data, we identify no new compelling candidates and confirm the existing candidate. Given the 6 successful core-collapse SNe in the sample and one likely failed SN, the implied fraction of core-collapses that result in failed SNe is at 90% confidence. If the current candidate is a failed SN, the fraction of failed SN naturally explains the missing high-mass red supergiant SN progenitors and the black hole mass function. If the current candidate is ultimately rejected, the data implies a 90% confidence upper limit on the failed SN fraction of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
