Proof Theory of Constructive Systems: Inductive Types and Univalence
Michael Rathjen

TL;DR
This paper explores the proof-theoretic foundations of constructive systems, examining inductive types, univalence, and their connections to various constructive frameworks like Martin-Lof type theory and explicit mathematics.
Contribution
It analyzes the proof-theoretic strength of constructive theories with inductive types and univalence, linking them to ordinal analysis and foundational frameworks.
Findings
Connections between explicit mathematics and type theories clarified
Strength of univalence axiom assessed through proof-theoretic methods
Ordinal-theoretic characterizations of constructive theories provided
Abstract
In Feferman's work, explicit mathematics and theories of generalized inductive definitions play a central role. One objective of this article is to describe the connections with Martin-Lof type theory and constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Proof theory has contributed to a deeper grasp of the relationship between different frameworks for constructive mathematics. Some of the reductions are known only through ordinal-theoretic characterizations. The paper also addresses the strength of Voevodsky's univalence axiom. A further goal is to investigate the strength of intuitionistic theories of generalized inductive definitions in the framework of intuitionistic explicit mathematics that lie beyond the reach of Martin-Lof type theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
