Testing decay of astrophysical neutrinos with incomplete information
Mauricio Bustamante (1, 2), John F. Beacom (1, 2, 3), Kohta, Murase (4, 5, 6) ((1) Ohio State U., CCAPP, (2) Ohio State U., (3) Ohio, State U., Dept. Astron., (4) Penn State U., University Park, IGC, (5) Penn, State U., (6) Penn State U., Astron. Astrophys.)

TL;DR
This paper proposes a method to use IceCube astrophysical neutrino data to significantly improve constraints on neutrino decay lifetimes, overcoming current uncertainties and potentially ruling out decay effects in other experiments.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to analyze astrophysical neutrino data for decay constraints, accounting for uncertainties and providing a practical roadmap for future analyses.
Findings
Sensitivity to neutrino decay lifetime can reach ~10 seconds (m/eV)
Method can rule out decay effects in solar, atmospheric, terrestrial neutrino experiments
Provides a framework for managing uncertainties in astrophysical neutrino analysis
Abstract
Neutrinos mix and have mass differences, so decays from one to another must occur. But how fast? The best direct limits on non-radiative decays, based on solar and atmospheric neutrinos, are weak, s (/eV) or much worse. Greatly improved sensitivity, s (/eV), will eventually be obtained using neutrinos from distant astrophysical sources, but large uncertainties --- in neutrino properties, source properties, and detection aspects --- do not allow this yet. However, there is a way forward now. We show that IceCube diffuse neutrino measurements, supplemented by improvements expected in the near term, can increase sensitivity to s (/eV) for all neutrino mass eigenstates. We provide a roadmap for the necessary analyses and show how to manage the many uncertainties. If limits are set, this would definitively rule out the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
