MUFASA: Galaxy star formation, gas, and metal properties across cosmic time
Romeel Dav\'e, Mika H. Rafieferantsoa, Robert J. Thompson, Philip F., Hopkins

TL;DR
MUFASA simulations effectively model galaxy evolution, matching many observed properties across cosmic time, though some discrepancies remain in high-SFR and metal-rich galaxy populations.
Contribution
This work demonstrates that MUFASA cosmological simulations can reproduce a wide range of galaxy properties and their evolution, validating the simulation approach for galaxy formation studies.
Findings
MUFASA broadly matches observed galaxy SFR, metallicity, and gas content.
The HI and H2 mass functions evolve with redshift as predicted.
Discrepancies include too many high-SFR galaxies and overly metal-rich, HI-poor galaxies at high masses.
Abstract
We examine galaxy star formation rates (SFRs), metallicities, and gas contents predicted by the MUFASA cosmological hydrodynamic simulations, which employ meshless hydrodynamics and novel feedback prescriptions that yield a good match to observed galaxy stellar mass assembly. We combine 50, 25, and 12.5 Mpc/h boxes with a quarter billion particles each to show that MUFASA broadly reproduces a wide range of relevant observations, including SFR and specific SFR functions, the mass-metallicity relation, HI and H2 fractions, HI (21 cm) and CO luminosity functions, and cosmic gas density evolution. There are mild but significant discrepancies, such as too many high-SFR galaxies, overly metal-rich and HI-poor galaxies at M*>10^{10} Mo, and sSFRs that are too low at z~1-2. The HI mass function increases by x2 out to z~1 then steepens to higher redshifts, while the CO luminosity function…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
