Testing the Large-Scale Environments of Cool-core and Noncool-core Clusters with Clustering Bias
Elinor Medezinski, Nicholas Battaglia, Jean Coupon, Renyue Cen,, Massimo Gaspari, Michael A. Strauss, David N. Spergel

TL;DR
This study investigates whether the formation history influences the distinction between cool-core and non-cool-core galaxy clusters by analyzing their clustering bias using galaxy cross-correlation functions.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel method to test the role of formation history in cluster types through relative assembly bias measurements using the two-point correlation function.
Findings
NCC clusters show a higher clustering bias than CC clusters, with a bias ratio of 1.42 ± 0.35.
The current sample size limits the statistical significance of the results.
Future larger samples will improve constraints on the origin of cluster bimodality.
Abstract
There are well-observed differences between cool-core (CC) and non-cool-core (NCC) clusters, but the origin of this distinction is still largely unknown. Competing theories can be divided into internal (inside-out), in which internal physical processes transform or maintain the NCC phase, and external (outside-in), in which the cluster type is determined by its initial conditions, which in turn lead to different formation histories (i.e., assembly bias). We propose a new method that uses the relative assembly bias of CC to NCC clusters, as determined via the two-point cluster-galaxy cross-correlation function (CCF), to test whether formation history plays a role in determining their nature. We apply our method to 48 ACCEPT clusters, which have well resolved central entropies, and cross-correlate with the SDSS-III/BOSS LOWZ galaxy catalog. We find that the relative bias of NCC over CC…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
