Revisiting the Completeness and the Luminosity Function in High-Redshift Low-Luminosity Quasar Surveys
Mana Niida, Tohru Nagao, Hiroyuki Ikeda, Kenta Matsuoka, Masakazu A., R. Kobayashi, Yoshiki Toba, Yoshiaki Taniguchi

TL;DR
This study revisits high-redshift low-luminosity quasar surveys, highlighting how spectral and intergalactic medium models influence completeness estimates and quasar luminosity functions, ultimately refining our understanding of quasar evolution.
Contribution
It demonstrates the impact of spectral luminosity dependence and IGM attenuation models on survey completeness and quasar luminosity function estimates at high redshift.
Findings
Completeness estimates are sensitive to spectral and IGM models.
Number density estimates vary by up to 24% at z~4 and 43% at z~5.
Results support the luminosity-dependent density evolution consistent with AGN downsizing.
Abstract
Recent studies have derived quasar luminosity functions (QLFs) at various redshifts. However, the faint side of the QLF at high redshifts is still too uncertain. An accurate estimate of the survey completeness is essential to derive an accurate QLF for use in studying the luminosity-dependent density evolution of the quasar population. Here we investigate how the luminosity dependence of quasar spectra (the Baldwin effect) and the attenuation model for the inter-galactic medium (IGM) affect the completeness estimates. For this purpose, we revisit the completeness of quasar surveys specifically at , using the COSMOS images observed with Subaru/Suprime-Cam. As the result, we find that the completeness estimates are sensitive to the luminosity dependence of the quasar spectrum and difference in the IGM attenuation models. At , the number density of quasars when we adopt…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
