Initial Results from the MAJORANA DEMONSTRATOR
S.R. Elliott, N. Abgrall, I.J. Arnquist, F.T. Avignone III, A.S., Barabash, F.E. Bertrand, A.W. Bradley, V. Brudanin, M. Busch, M. Buuck, T.S., Caldwell, Y-D. Chan, C.D. Christofferson, P.-H. Chu, C. Cuesta, J.A., Detwiler, C. Dunagan, Yu. Efremenko, H. Ejiri, A. Fullmer, A.

TL;DR
The paper reports initial results from the MAJORANA DEMONSTRATOR, a Ge detector array designed to search for neutrinoless double-beta decay, aiming to establish background levels and scalability for future large-scale experiments.
Contribution
It presents the first physics data and commissioning results of the MAJORANA DEMONSTRATOR, demonstrating progress towards a scalable, low-background Ge-based neutrinoless double-beta decay experiment.
Findings
Initial detector module commissioning results
Background levels suitable for future scaling
Progress towards full detector array assembly
Abstract
Neutrinoless double-beta decay searches seek to determine the nature of neutrinos, the existence of a lepton violating process, and the effective Majorana neutrino mass. The {\sc Majorana} Collaboration is assembling an array of high purity Ge detectors to search for neutrinoless double-beta decay in Ge. The {\sc Majorana Demonstrator} is composed of 44.8~kg (29.7 kg enriched in Ge) of Ge detectors in total, split between two modules contained in a low background shield at the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota. The initial goals of the {\sc Demonstrator} are to establish the required background and scalability of a Ge-based, next-generation, tonne-scale experiment. Following a commissioning run that began in 2015, the first detector module started physics data production in early 2016. We will discuss initial results of the Module 1 commissioning…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
