Herschel-ATLAS: Revealing dust build-up and decline across gas, dust and stellar mass selected samples: I. Scaling relations
P. De Vis, L. Dunne, S. Maddox, H.L. Gomez, C.J.R. Clark, A.E. Bauer,, S. Viaene, S.P. Schofield, M. Baes, A.J. Baker, N. Bourne, S.P. Driver, S., Dye, S.A. Eales, C. Furlanetto, R.J. Ivison, A.S.G. Robotham, K. Rowlands,, D.J.B. Smith, M.W.L. Smith, E. Valiante, A.H. Wright

TL;DR
This study investigates how dust, gas, and stars relate in local galaxies, revealing that dust content peaks at high gas fractions and that galaxy evolution affects dust obscuration and gas conversion efficiency.
Contribution
It provides new insights into dust and gas scaling relations across different galaxy evolutionary stages, especially in HI-rich, early-stage galaxies.
Findings
Dust content is below expectations at high gas fractions.
Dust mass peaks at a gas fraction of ~75%.
Atomic gas depletion time increases with gas fraction.
Abstract
We present a study of the dust, stars and atomic gas (HI) in an HI-selected sample of local galaxies (z<0.035) in the Herschel Astrophysical Terahertz Large Area Survey (H-ATLAS) fields. This HI-selected sample reveals a population of very high gas fraction (>80 per cent), low stellar mass sources that appear to be in the earliest stages of their evolution. We compare this sample with dust and stellar mass selected samples to study the dust and gas scaling relations over a wide range of gas fraction (proxy for evolutionary state of a galaxy). The most robust scaling relations for gas and dust are those linked to NUV-r (SSFR) and gas fraction, these do not depend on sample selection or environment. At the highest gas fractions, our additional sample shows the dust content is well below expectations from extrapolating scaling relations for more evolved sources, and dust is not a good…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
