Multiuser Detection in Multibeam Satellite Systems: Theoretical Analysis and Practical Schemes
Giulio Colavolpe, Andrea Modenini, Amina Piemontese, and Alessandro, Ugolini

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the achievable data rates in multibeam satellite systems, proposing multiuser detection and transmission strategies to improve performance over traditional single-user detection, supported by an information-theoretic framework and coding scheme evaluations.
Contribution
It introduces a theoretical framework for multiuser detection in satellite systems and proposes practical coding and transmission modifications to enhance data rates.
Findings
Multiuser detection outperforms single-user detection near beam edges.
Classical DVB-S2(X) codes are inadequate with multiuser detection.
Redesigned coding schemes improve performance close to theoretical limits.
Abstract
We consider the rates achievable by a user in a multibeam satellite system for unicast applications, and propose alternatives to the conventional single-user symbol-by-symbol detection applied at user terminals. Single-user detection is known to suffer from strong degradation when the terminal is located near the edge of the coverage area of a beam, and when aggressive frequency reuse is adopted. For this reason, we consider multiuser detection, and take into account the strongest interfering signal. We also analyze two additional transmission strategies requiring modifications at medium access control layer. We describe an information-theoretic framework to compare the different strategies by computing the information rate of the user in the reference beam. Furthermore, we analyze the performance of coded schemes that could approach the information-theoretic limits. We show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
