Answer to a question of Ros\l{}anowski and Shelah
M\'ark Po\'or

TL;DR
This paper proves that in any locally compact non-discrete group, there exists a subgroup that is null but non-meager, affirming a conjecture about the structure of such groups.
Contribution
It extends previous results by confirming the existence of null but non-meager subgroups in all locally compact non-discrete groups, not just specific cases.
Findings
Existence of null but non-meager subgroups in all locally compact non-discrete groups
Affirmative answer to Ros extl{}anowski and Shelah's question in the general case
Generalization beyond the Cantor group and reals
Abstract
In [arXiv:1605.02261] Ros\l{}anowski and Shelah asked whether every locally compact non-discrete group has a null but non-meager subgroup, and conversely, whether it is consistent with that in every locally compact group a meager subgroup is always null. They gave affirmative answers for both questions in the case of the Cantor group and the reals. In this paper we give affirmative answers for the general case.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Advanced Operator Algebra Research
