Effect heterogeneity and variable selection for standardizing causal effects to a target population
Anders Huitfeldt, Sonja A. Swanson, Mats Julius Stensrud, Etsuji, Suzuki

TL;DR
This paper explores different homogeneity conditions for standardizing causal effects across populations, comparing their assumptions, implications for covariate selection, and methods, including recent counterfactual approaches.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of homogeneity conditions for effect standardization and discusses their implications for covariate selection and causal effect estimation.
Findings
Different homogeneity conditions have distinct implications for covariate selection.
Counterfactual approaches can avoid some traditional problems but may require extensive covariate adjustment.
The paper clarifies when and how standardization procedures yield unbiased effect estimates.
Abstract
The participants in randomized trials and other studies used for causal inference are often not representative of the populations seen by clinical decision-makers. To account for differences between populations, researchers may consider standardizing results to a target population. We discuss several different types of homogeneity conditions that are relevant for standardization: Homogeneity of effect measures, homogeneity of counterfactual outcome state transition parameters, and homogeneity of counterfactual distributions. Each of these conditions can be used to show that a particular standardization procedure will result in unbiased estimates of the effect in the target population, given assumptions about the relevant scientific context. We compare and contrast the homogeneity conditions, in particular their implications for selection of covariates for standardization and their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
