Distinguishing Galois representations by their normalized traces
Vijay M. Patankar, C. S. Rajan

TL;DR
This paper proves that two pure Galois representations with equal normalized Frobenius traces at a positive density set of primes are essentially twists of each other, under certain conditions, with applications to modular forms.
Contribution
It establishes a criterion for distinguishing Galois representations based on normalized traces, extending previous results and applying to modular forms.
Findings
Two Galois representations with equal normalized traces are twists of each other.
The result applies to modular forms, confirming a known theorem.
Conditions include connected algebraic monodromy and irreducibility.
Abstract
Suppose \( \rho_1 \) and \( \rho_2 \) are two pure Galois representations of the absolute Galois group of a number field of weights \( k_1 \) and \( k_2 \) respectively, having equal normalized Frobenius traces \( Tr(\rho_1(\sigma_v)) /Nv^{k_1/2}\) and \( Tr(\rho_2(\sigma_v)) /Nv^{k_2/2}\) at a set of primes \( v\) of with positive upper density. Assume further that the algebraic monodromy group of is connected and the repesentation is absolutely irreducible. We prove that \( \rho_1 \) and \( \rho_2 \) are twists of each other by power of a Tate twist times a character of finite order. We apply this to modular forms and deduce a result proved by Murty and Pujahari.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Advanced Mathematical Identities
